Are Led Zeppelin really the best band ever?

June 7th, 2010

Led Zeppelin, back in the days when even invisible guitars sounded great

Led Zeppelin, back in the days when even invisible guitars sounded great

According to BBC2 viewers and Radio 2 listeners, Led Zeppelin are the best band ever. A live poll conducted at the finale of the BBC 2 series ‘I’m In A Rock And Roll Band!’ crowned the Seventies rock gods, after boiling it down to a short list of three: Zep, Queen and The Beatles.

All good choices, of course, coming from a longlist of The Clash, The Jimi Hendrix Experience, Joy Division, Nirvana, Radiohead, The Rolling Stones & The Smiths. Presumably a lot of names got weeded out along the way but it’s hard to argue with Led Zeppelin, an incredible coming together of great musicians who pushed and pulled rock music in a host of new directions while essentially defining what it meant to be a hard, heavy, sexy rock band.

But personally, I would put them third on the list.

<<Read More >>

The Rolling Stones make the charts sound human again

May 24th, 2010

 

 

Mick & Keith: another long night at the coal face, Villa Nellcote, 1972. Pic Dominique Tarle

The Rolling Stones are number one in the album charts with a sprawling, messy double album recorded 38 years ago. It helps that ‘Exile On Main Street’ is widely hailed as one the greatest albums ever made, and yet it is, paradoxically, comparatively obscure. It doesn’t have many hits on it (only Tumbling Dice shows up regularly on Stones compilations) and wasn’t particularly enthusiastically reviewed on release (I have a lovely quote from a young Ken Follet in one of my Stones books, in which the future best-selling author suggests that this album will kill their career, because “they seem to have reached a dead end”). But Exile has grown in reputation, partly because of the myths of its creation (which I have written about elsewhere) and partly because it is such a whole piece, a trawl through all kinds of roots American music by a band of talented players getting off on the sheer joy and exuberance of creation.

In its re-mastered form, with an album’s worth of extra tracks, it is currently to be found everywhere (from newspapers to magazines to internet to radio and TV documentaries) being hailed as the definitive Stones album, which has no doubt contributed to its chart surge, as it is bought by its original fans and new generations of music lovers alike. Even Mick Jagger has been extolling its virtues, although he has never previously been one of its great champions, perhaps because it is generally hailed as Keith Richards’ masterpiece. Jagger has previously intimated that if it had a few more decent tunes, he might consider ranking it alongside ‘Beggars Banquet’ or ‘Let It Bleed’. Sadly, according to Watts, Jagger rejected the idea that the Stones play the entire album as an 18-song anniversary concert because it doesn’t give him enough to go on as a performer. But what does he know? He’s only the singer.

<<Read More >>

Exile on Main Street: the myths & the magic

The making of the Rolling Stones’s Exile on Main Street is a rock legend. But what really happened in those long weeks of 1971?

Published: 11:36AM BST 18 May 2010 

 

The Rolling Stones’s Exile On Main Street is an album so shrouded in myth it practically defines the bohemian, decadent, counter-culture appeal of Seventies rock ’n’ roll. It is wild, electric music played by narcotic demigods with one foot in the 20th century and the other in some ancient, mystic swamp of steamy, primal passion. From the freak show photo montage on the original gatefold cover to the four sides of black vinyl crammed with a weird concoction of ragged r&b, country, soul and gospel, this was a voodoo jam from a band of outlaw rockers on the run.

The myth goes something like this: It was 1971. The greatest rock ’n’ roll band in the world were forced into exile, chased away from Britain by Labour’s 93 per cent tax on the rich (and the revelation that their accountants hadn’t been paying it). Desperate, they decamped to the south of France, where the heroin-addicted Keith Richards set up a studio in the basement of the rented Villa Nellcote.

<<Read More >>

Why do U2 want to play Glastonbury?

November 24th, 2009

 

 

U2 are to headline Glastonbury this year, on the festival’s 40th anniversary. There has been some predictable scepticism expressed about this from the anti-U2 brigade, although it seems a bit of a no-brainer to me: rock band plays rock festival – let the controversy begin!

Like last year’s headliners, Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band, the Irish group have a long established reputation as outstanding live performers, which has helped make them one of the most consistently popular live attractions of the last few decades. It was probably a given that U2 would get to Glastonbury sooner or later (The Rolling Stones are really the only other band of that stature never to have played the festival), the real question being why has it taken them 26 years.

The answer lies partly in the fact that U2 just don’t need Glastonbury, or any other festival. They are one of the few bands who can pull mass crowds under their own steam on a regular basis anywhere in the world. And, certainly since they ascended to stadium status with The Joshua Tree in 1987, they have put a great deal of care and effort into creating their own unique and artfully integrated live environments. Whenever the issue of Glastonbury has arisen within the U2 camp, the same questions tend to arise, which, if I might paraphrase the succinct directness of their very pragmatic drummer, boil down to: “So, if I understand this correctly, we wouldn’t be playing to our fans, right? It’s not our sound system? It’s not our lighting rig? And we would be doing this for a fee that would be less than we would make on the gate at our own gig? And the point of this would be …?”

So what has changed? Well, Glastonbury itself, for one thing.

<<Read More >>

Susan Boyle: sympathy for the devil?

Susan Boyle’s performance of The Rolling Stones’ classic ‘Wild Horses’ on her American television debut is such a typically audacious Simon Cowell manoeuvre, its hard to know whether to be appalled or applaud his Satanic daring. Just like his appropriation of Leonard Cohen’s (and Jeff Buckley’s) ‘Hallelujah’ for X Factor, Cowell has staged another blitzkrieg raid on one of the sacred spaces of rock culture.

 

‘Wild Horses’ is not just any old rock and roll song. It’s a raw, emotional country ballad from 1971’s Sticky Fingers, when The Stones had moved away from pop, led by Keith Richards on a journey deep into the roots of their favourite music. It is probably hardcore fans’ favourite period and this is the big ballad at its centre, not a huge hit single, and not as well known to the general public as the more saccharine ‘Angie’, but rather a kind of distillation of the relationship between Mick and Keith, when they were still the Glimmer twins, two poles of attraction, constantly pulling apart yet bound together. Live, it is often performed as an acoustic duet, and still symbolically represents a moment of harmony, mutual dependency and lingering affection between the increasingly divided Jagger and Richards pairing. So it is a song with a special magic about it, and one can almost sense Cowell’s glee as he descends upon it, dragging it into the crass spotlight of his lowest common denominator entertainment empire.

 

Does anybody really believe Cowell is a Rolling Stones fan? This is the man who said the Beatles wouldn’t have made it on the X Factor, so one can only imagine his thoughts on Jagger’s mangled singing and Richards superbly sloppy playing. I doubt he is even familiar with the original. One imagines he has teams of minions crawling through back catalogues seeking out such gems. Perhaps he alighted on it through one of the many cover versions. Susan Boyle is certainly not the first person to sing ‘Wild Horses’, and not even the worst. Indeed, Gram Parsons recorded it with The Flying Burrito Brothers before the Stones version was released. That’s how cool this song is. It’s been covered by Leon Russell, Neil Young, soul group Labelle, Elvis Costello, Alicia Keys, Guns N Roses, Dave Matthews and such unlikely Stones acolytes as The Cranberries and Deacon Blue. Maybe Cowell heard Sheryl Crows’ or (lord help us) Natasha Bedingfield’s versions. But most likely it was brought to his attention when a contestant on Canadian Idol performed the song. He would have noted how melodic it was, how potentially epic. He would have mentally erased Richard’s guitars and replaced it with a full orchestra. And he would have delighted in the counter-intuitive notion of the uncoolest star on the planet greeting her American audience with a song by a couple of the original icons of rock cool. It is the final proof that the Rolling Stones have indeed gathered moss. Their image may never recover.

 

To some, of course, such a version would be a kind of travesty, which must have made it all the more appealing. To most it would be a novelty, which is the area of music in which Cowell is most comfortable. One can only be thankful that he didn’t alight on ‘Sympathy For The Devil’, but that may have been too close to the bone.

 

Boyle acquitted herself well enough. It’s hard to object to her. She may not be the outstanding singer her fans laud her as but she has a story that connected with the public and she performs with authentic emotion and technical skill, and that’s really what the whole TV talent show circus is all about. I can’t imagine her in pre-fame days, sitting in her room, listening to a crackling vinyl copy of ‘Sticky Fingers’ and dreaming of the time she would get to sing it out to the whole of America, but she seemed to find something to connect to and she performed it like she believed in it. Maybe it’s the line ‘graceless lady’. Yet there a bleeding despair at the heart of that song that she can never touch, especially in a version as musically anodyne as this, where all the nuance is reduced to a plodding piano and identikit orchestration, the sound of a million middle of the road ballads. And the phrase “wild horses” seems as distant from Susan Boyle’s persona as it is possible to get. Maybe she should have changed the lyric to fit in with her own reality: “A number 42 bus couldn’t drag me away from you.” The funny thing about her performance on America’s Got Talent is that even the audience don’t recognise the song til she gets to the chorus, when a ripple of shock and awe goes through the crowd.

 

Wild Horses has given Simon Cowell his water cooler moment, and may give Susan Boyle her first US hit. After this, you can expect to hear the song performed in every karaoke session ‘til kingdom come, to be bellowed in pubs and parties by every amateur balladeer until there is not an ounce of the original sentiment left to wring out. There’s something to look forward to. In the meantime, we have Susan Boyle’s definitive version. Although frankly, there aren’t enough wild horses left in the land to get me to listen to it again.

 

Allen Klein: Rest In Pieces

Last week, I was talking to an acquaintance of mine, a rock critic who also writes obituaries (which is perhaps not such an unusual career combination, given the low life expectancy of most rock stars). I asked whether he prepares his obituaries in advance. “Only Allen Klein’s”, he replied. “I hate that man so much, it gives me pleasure to write his obituary.”

Well, he finally got to put his work to its proper use. Klein, a former manager of The Beatles and The Rolling Stones amongst others, passed away on the 4th of July, aged 77, from complications of Altzheimers. And while one does not wish to speak ill of the dead, I imagine there may have been the quite clinking of champagne glasses in the private quarters of surviving members of the greatest bands that ever walked the earth. I don’t suppose Klein himself would be particularly bothered by that thought. Indeed, he might have enjoyed it. He appeared to delight in his bad reputation. For many years, Klein displayed on his desk a parody of the 23rd psalm: ‘Though I walk in the valley of the shadow of evil, I have no fear, as I am the biggest bastard in the valley.”

 

 

Klein, Yoko Ono & John Lennon, 1970. image AP

The many obituaries will outline the salient details of his career, but in rock myth he will be remembered as the prototypical untrustworthy and self-serving manager. Or, as Pete Townsend of The Who described him, “the awesome rock-leech Godfather.”

<< Read More >>